Press Release

The religion clause of the First Amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  The First Amendment also protects freedom of speech, press, assembly, and redress.

The religion clause of the First Amendment says: “Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.”  The First
Amendment also protects freedom of speech, press, assembly, and redress.

The religion clause has been interpreted over the years by
scholars and the Supreme Court to mean that the state shall not interfere in
the realm of religion nor shall religion interfere in governance by the state.  Many scholars, including Thomas Jefferson,
have called this the wall of separation between church and state.

The Central Savannah River Chapter of Americans United for
Separation of Church and State has been formed to affirm the First
Amendment.  Our concerns center on public
education and religious diversity, threats to hard won individual freedom from
theocratic interference in governance, the threat to religious freedom by the
dominance of the religious majority, and the threat to religion by government
interference in religious activities.

There are a number of religions represented in the CSRA, all
of whose members are guaranteed the freedom to practice their beliefs within
the bounds of the laws protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
guaranteed to all citizens.  While there
are some limits on the practice of religion, the freedom to practice one’s
religion is one of the most fundamental rights of citizens of the US.  Religious practices in the CSRA are varied,
including the more common Christians, both Protestants and Catholics, the less
common Jews and Muslims, but also the minority Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists,
Pagans, B’hais, Jains, Agnostics, Humanists, and others.  The Constitution guarantees the individuals
of all these religious affiliations, or indeed non-affliated individuals, the
right to practice religion as each sees fit within the confines of the
law.  Religion is a highly variable,
intensely personal belief system that requires considerable tolerance by
governance to protect the variety of practices that arise within religious
ideology, but have no adverse effect on the efficient and fair function of the

The democratic process requires that the populace be educated
so that the populace can make informed decisions concerning the well being of
the government.  In order to protect
religious freedom that education should include education in comparative
religion so that voters understand the tenets of a myriad of belief systems and
how each belief system can be accommodated wisely
within the confines of protecting individual liberty.  Note that the education proposed is not an
indoctrination into a specific religion, but an education about the general
tenets of each religion, recognizing that within each religion there will be a
number of sects that exhibit subtle differences from the common tenets.  Indeed, it is likely that each of the
individuals within those sects will exhibit subtle differences from the
professed beliefs of that sect.  All of
these religious beliefs are protected by the first amendment as long as the
practices that they promote do not interfere with the rights of others.

Over the years there have been attempts to use government
resources to promote specific religious ideas. 
Most recently efforts have been directed toward the teaching of Creation
Science and Intelligent Design in public schools.  These ideas have been proposed as
alternatives to teaching the process of evolution, but both of the ideas
originated as religious tenets and were dressed as science for presentation to
the public.  There is no scientific
evidence for either of the ideas, and while we believe that anyone has the
right to believe those tenets if they choose to do so, government resources
should not be used to promote either Creation Science or Intelligent Design
because both are fundamentally religious. 
And they certainly should not supplant the teaching of evolution, since
there is considerable scientific evidence supporting that process.

Nor should government funds or property be used to support
the posting of the Ten Commandments.  The
commandments are fundamentally religious in nature and as such should not be
promoted by the state.  Indeed, only four
(6 thru 9) of the ten commandments are relevant to government, the other six (1
thru 5 and 10) are the promotion of monotheism, respect and desire, religious
functions indeed, but not functions that should
involve government.

The religious clause of the first amendment also guarantees
that the dominant religion will not bully minority religions into
submission.  Human history is replete
with examples of such bullying.  It is
time to recognize that individuals have a right to their own religious views
and that neither the state nor a religious corporation has a right to impose
religious beliefs on any individual.  The
best way to guarantee both religious freedom and the neutrality of government
is to keep religion and government
completely separate.  It is our job as
the Central Savannah River Chapter of Americans
United for Separation of Church and State to educate the public that complete
separation of church and state is desirable, possible, and, indeed, imperative.


In God We Trust … All Others Pay Cash

Before the days of credit and debit cards, one used to see signs similar to the one above in diners, service stations, food stores, and many other establishments, obviously playing on the use of the motto “In God We Trust” that is on our coins and paper currency. It may come as a surprise to many younger and even not so young persons that this was not always so, that the regular use of “In God We Trust” on US coins did not begin until 1908.

History of Motto “In
God We Trust” and “Under God”
in the Pledge of Allegiance 

By Ralph C. Reynolds,
former President,
Rochester Chapter, Americans United for
Separation of Church and State
 (Written about the year
2000 or before.)

Before the days of credit
and debit cards, one used to see signs similar to the one above in diners,
service stations, food stores, and many other establishments, obviously playing
on the use of the motto “In God We Trust” that is on our coins and
paper currency. It may come as a surprise to many younger and even not so young
persons that this was not always so, that the regular use of “In God We
Trust” on US coins did not begin until 1908. “In God We Trust”
was not made an official motto of the United States until 1956, and the motto
did not appear on paper money until 1957. The history of the choice of “In
God We Trust” as an official motto of the United States and the practice
of placing “In God We Trust” on coins and bills is a tale of
historical revisionism, perfidy by our elected representatives and appointed
officials, and ecclesiastical opportunism whose results have tended to eat away
at the foundations of our liberties and threaten the very idea of the
separation of church and state.

In contrast to the
Declaration of Independence, and quite deliberately, the Constitution of the
United States contains not a single reference to a deity or to divine
inspiration. This was, of course, due to the genius of the founding fathers who
saw in Europe and elsewhere the strife that had been engendered by the adoption
of official religions in nearly all Old World countries. Yet we frequently see
in letters to the editor and elsewhere the claim that the US was created and
remains a Christian nation. I have had several e-mail notes from evangelicals
and fundamentalists who have maintained the same thing. When pressed as to where
this idea comes from, they point to the words “In God We Trust” on all
our money and the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag. Well, how did this come about? How did the clearly unconstitutional words
“In God We Trust” and “under God” come to appear on our
money and in our Pledge of Allegiance?

In the early years of our
country, around 1800, when church affiliation was perhaps 10% (some authorities
say up to 17-20%) of the population, the motto on our coins, then the major
medium of exchange, was often just “LIBERTY.” In 1776, Congress
appointed John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson to design a Great
Seal for the fledgling country. The motto they adopted for the Great Seal was E
Pluribus Unum, meaning “from many, one” or “one unity composed
of many parts.” Although the design was rejected, the motto was adopted by
the designers of the Great Seal approved by Congress in 1782. The motto was first
used on coins of the United States mint in 1795, and both legends, that is,
LIBERTY and E Pluribus Unum, were used somewhat regularly on coins throughout
the nineteenth century.

By 1860 the proportion of
church-related persons in the United States had slowly doubled or tripled to
about 40% of the population, and during and following the Civil War, there was
a burgeoning of religious fanaticism in America that built on a general feeling
fed by the clergy that the Civil War was God’s punishment for omitting His name
from the Constitution. In 1863, eleven Protestant denominations banded together
to petition the Congress to correct the oversight by the founders and “reform”
the Constitution to indicate that the United States was created as and remained
a Christian nation. Thus, the so-called National Reform Association submitted
the following additions to the preamble:

We, the people of the
United States, humbly acknowledging almighty God as the source of all authority
and power in civil government, the Lord Jesus Christ as the ruler among
nations, his revealed will as the supreme law of the land, in order to
constitute a Christian government, and in order to form a more perfect union,
establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general welfare, and secure the inalienable rights and the
blessings of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to ourselves, our
posterity, and all the people, do ordain and establish this Constitution for
the United States of America.

The Christian amendment never
gained the approval of the Congress or of any of the states. When introduced
again in 1874 it never got out of committee. In its heyday, however, in the
early 1860s, the NRA (not the gun people) had as members many prominent men
including a Supreme Court Justice, William Strong, and two ex-governors of
Pennsylvania, J.W. Geary and James Pollock. The stated and well-known goal of
the NRA was the creation of a Christian theocracy in the United States.
Although they were singularly unsuccessful in their primary goal of amending
the preamble, the organization lasted through the first half of the twentieth century
and apparently still had registered lobbyists in the late 1950s.

Our story now takes another
tack as President Lincoln had in 1861 fortuitously appointed the religious
zealot and NRA member James Pollock as Director of the Mint. In November 1861,
a certain Rev. Mark Richard Watkinson, pastor of a Baptist church in Delaware
County, Pennsylvania, wrote a letter to Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P.
Chase pointing out that the lack of “recognition of the Almighty God in
some form on our coins” was a serious oversight by those responsible for
the nation’s coinage. The good pastor recommended that the Goddess of Liberty
be replaced by a specified arrangement of 13 stars, the words “perpetual union,”
the all-seeing eye crowned with a halo, and a flag with the words “God,
liberty, law” written within the folds of the bars. “This,” said
the parson, “would make a beautiful coin to which no possible citizen could
object. This would relieve us from the ignominy of heathenism. This would place
us openly under the divine protection we have personally claimed….”

Obviously moved by these
eloquent words, Secretary Chase wrote a letter to his Director of the Mint,
James Pollock: Dear Sir: No nation can be strong except in the strength of God,
or safe except in his defense. The trust of our people in God should be
declared on our national coins. You will cause a device to be prepared without unnecessary
delay with a motto expressing…this national recognition.

Pollock leapt at this
chance and in 1863 submitted several designs to Chase that incorporated
variations of the mottos “Our Trust is in God” and “God and Our
Country.” Shortly after the designs were submitted in December 1863,
Secretary Chase notified Pollock that the mottos were approved but suggested
that they should be modified to place “Our God and Our Country” on
one coin and “In God We Trust” on another. In 1864 Congress agreed to
this proposal by passing a law that contained the words, “…and the
shape, mottoes, and devices of said coins shall be fixed by the director of the
mint, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.” Thus, unable to
convert the nation into a theocracy by legal means, the avowed supporter of
Christian theocracy was given another chance and succeeded in his goal of
subverting the Constitution. The nation now officially recognized God as its
protector through the agency of the United States mint.

Things were pretty quiet
for about 40 years as the government solidified the nation’s position as a de
facto Protestant theocracy. Church affiliation is reported to have risen to
well over 40% of the population in the latter half of the century. Protestants
dominated the positions of power in both the government and the private sector.

Now the coinage act of 1864
did not specify the wording to be placed on the coins, and this fact opened the
door to further mischief as the act provided that the Secretary of the
Treasury, acting on the advice of the Director of the Mint, could change the
wording at any time. President Theodore Roosevelt, whose term of office started
in 1901, was a staunch admirer of the sculptor Saint-Gaudens, and he persuaded
Treasury Secretary Shaw to commission Saint-Gaudens to provide new designs for
the nations coinage. Saint-Gaudens, however, disapproved of the use of “In
God We Trust” on coins for aesthetic reasons, and it turned out that Theodore
Roosevelt. also disapproved of the motto “In God We Trust” on coins,
but for religious reasons, not aesthetic ones. Roosevelt thought that having
the “In God We Trust” motto on common coins that were abused in all
sorts of manners was close to sacrilege.

When these views attacking
the use of the inscription “In God We Trust” were made public, there
was a huge public outcry, and the White House and members of Congress were
deluged with protests and petitions from the religious sectors demanding the
restoration of “In God We Trust” to the coinage. Quickly caving in to
the public outcry, Roosevelt notified the House and Senate leadership that he
would not veto a bill specifying that “In God We Trust” be inscribed
on all coins if it passed both houses. A bill was indeed passed by the House in
March and by the Senate in May of 1908; the bill became Public Law No. 120 when
signed by Roosevelt on May 18, 1908. The law said in part, “Be it enacted
by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled, that the motto ‘In God We Trust,’ heretofore inscribed on
certain denominations of gold and silver coins of the United States of America,
shall hereafter be inscribed on all such gold and silver coins of said
denominations as heretofore.”

The extension of the use of
the “In God We Trust” motto to paper money came about as paper
currency more and more assumed the status of the principal medium of exchange
in the country. As the country had experienced over 40 years of exposure to the
motto on our coins without serious protest, in the late 1940s some religionists
thought it was about time that the motto was placed on our paper currency to
thank the Lord for preserving us through the terrible war that had just ended
[ignoring the fact that the German army had the motto “Gott mit Uns”
(God with us) inscribed on their belt buckles]. In 1953, one Matthew R. Rothert
of Arkansas, president of the Arkansas Numismatic Society, presented the idea
of putting “In God We Trust” on all paper money to a meeting of his group.
The favorable reaction by his audience prompted him to send a written proposal
for such a change to Treasury Secretary Humphrey, but he also sent copies of
the correspondence to Commerce Secretary Weeks and to President Eisenhower.
This single letter prompted the Eisenhower administration in June 1955 to
recommend to Congress a bill (H.R. 619) that would “[provide] for the
inscription of ‘In God We Trust’ on all United States currency and coins.”
Introduced into the House, a representative from Florida characterized the
object of the bill as, “…in these days when imperialistic and
materialistic communism seeks to attack and destroy freedom,…” a way to
“…strengthen the foundations of our freedom. At the base of our freedom
is our faith in God and the desire of Americans to live by His will and His
guidance. As long as this country trusts in God, it will prevail. To serve as a
constant reminder of this truth, it is highly desirable that our currency and coins
should bear these inspiring words ‘In God We Trust.'”  Introduced amidst the Cold War hysteria of
the 1950s, this bill was rapidly approved by the House and shortly thereafter
by the Senate with little debate. The words “In God We Trust” have
appeared on all United States currency issued after October 1, 1957.

Emboldened by the rapidity
with which the Congress embraced the use of the “In God We Trust”
motto on paper money, Congressional forces still energized by rampant
McCarthyism and anti-Communism thought it the opportune time to make the
“In God We Trust” motto the “national motto.” Introduced on
March 22, 1956, H.R. Res. 396 was quickly approved and signed into law on July
30, 1956 (36 U.S.C. Section 186), thus completing the campaign of the
religionists to instill the Christian nation idea into the consciousness of all
Americans through the agency of a few individuals who found a way to circumvent
the normal safeguards of liberty enshrined in the United States Constitution.  Challenges to the “In God We Trust”

The use of “In God We
Trust” as the motto on our paper currency and coins has been subject to
legal challenges in the courts. In the first such case, Aronow v. United States
(1970), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that,
“It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and
currency, ‘In God We Trust’–, has nothing whatsoever to do with the
establishment of religion. Its use is of a patriotic or ceremonial character
and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious
exercise.” A second challenge, Madalyn Murray O’Hair v. W. Michael
Blumenthal, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. (1978) was heard in the United
States District Court, Western District of Texas. The court opined that, based on
the above ruling by the Ninth Circuit court, “From this it is easy to deduce
that the Court concluded that the primary purpose of the slogan was secular; it
served a secular ceremonial purpose in the obviously secular function of
providing a medium of exchange.” Several other court cases were also
unsuccessful despite the plaintiffs assertion that the motto was clearly of a
religious nature in making a statement about God and encouraging belief in that
God. Americans ask piety in presidents, not displays of religious preference.
New York Times editorial, Jan. 31, 1984

Does the Motto Pass the
Lemon Test?

The three-pronged Lemon test
for constitutionality under the First Amendment was delineated in the majority
opinion written by Chief Justice Warren Burger in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) as
“First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its
principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits
religion; finally, the statute must not ‘foster an excessive government
entanglement with religion.'” This view was affirmed in, for example,
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (413 U.S. 756,
1973), which declared New York parochial school aid unconstitutional. Recently.
several court observers have questioned the usefulness of the Lemon test, and
although it has not been formally overruled, many recent establishment clause cases
have been decided without referring to it. Nevertheless, it is the opinion of
many observers that the laws specifying the national motto and providing for
the placement of the motto on currency and coins of the United States clearly
fail all three parts of the Lemon test.


I pledge allegiance to my
Flag and (to) the Republic for which it stands: one Nation, indivisible, with
Liberty and Justice for all.  This pledge
was issued by the executive committee at the dedication of the World’s Fair
Grounds in Chicago, IL, on October 21, 1892; subsequent research suggested that
it was written by the Committee chairman, Francis Bellamy (United States Flag
Association, 1939). Originally consisting of 22 words, the word “to”
was added immediately after the first celebration. The pledge was first revised
at the First National Flag Conference in 1923 when the words “the Flag of
the United States” were substituted for “my Flag,” and the words
“of America” were added to that phrase at the Second National Flag
Conference in 1924. (We might note in passing that the United States is the
only country in the world that pledges allegiance to a flag!) The pledge of
allegiance did not, however, become the official Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag until Public Law 79-287 was signed on December 28, 1941 by President F.D. Roosevelt
to prepare it for service in the war effort.

Nevertheless, the Pledge of
Allegiance remained thoroughly secular, as demanded by the Constitution, for 62
years. Then, in the early 1950s, as with the national motto, a group of
religionists used the concerns of the cold war against “Godless”
communism to remedy the lack of foresight of the writer of the pledge in
omitting any reference to Christianity or, the next best thing, to God. But
this time it was a Roman Catholic organization that got the ball rolling when
the Knights of Columbus began a campaign that would alter the fundamental relationship
of our national government to the governed that had existed for 178 years.

The Knights of Columbus had
apparently in 1951 instituted their own version of the Pledge of Allegiance for
use at their meetings that contained the words “under God.” Seeing
that the time was right, they enlisted the cooperation of the American Legion
in lobbying the Executive branch and the Congress to add “under God”
to the pledge. Ignoring the Constitution and caving in to the expediency of the
moment, President Eisenhower expressed support for the measure, and it was
passed on Flag Day, June 14, 1954.

This was a major expansion
of the religious province of government officials; what had previously been
expressions of personal piety, as in Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and the
Emancipation Proclamation, were now transmogrified into the first religious
test instituted for citizens of this nation. Clearly the addition of
“under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance is an “establishment of
religion” and thus is clearly unconstitutional.


This brief history of the
paths by which the national motto, “In God We Trust”, was born and
caused to be placed on our paper currency and coins and the words “under
God” were added to the Pledge of Allegiance demonstrates that these
actions were never approved by the mass of the American people but were the
result of opportunistic actions of, by and large, two religious fanatics acting
90 years apart. But James Pollock and Matthew Rothert could only accomplish
these acts with the inadvertent help of Theodore Roosevelt and the acquiescence
of many government officials and elected representatives who forgot that they
were charged with upholding and defending the Constitution of the United
States. What can be done about this situation? For the present, perhaps,
nothing, but we can still correct the false ideas that many persons hold that
“In God We Trust” has “been on our money since year 1” and
that the presence of the motto indicates that we are a Christian nation and
thus the mass of us should accommodate Christians when they seek to override
the Constitution. Then perhaps someday we can restore the proper motto for our
diverse nation, E Pluribus Unum, to its rightful place as emblematic of
American democracy.  It has been pointed
out by some ecclesiastics that the motto “In God We Trust” does not
mention Christ or Christianity, but indeed, includes over 90% of the population
that believes, according to recent surveys, in “God,” whether they
are Christians or not. This appears to be mere dissimulation; the phrase
“In God We Trust” has never been used by Jews or Muslims or any other
faith that is based on the monotheistic God of the Jews except Christianity.
The phrase “In God We Trust” does not appear in the Bible. Although
there are many passages in the “Old Testament” that refer to placing
one’s trust in the Lord, the New Testament contains only two passages that, in
the Authorized (King James) version, refer to trusting in God, namely, 1
Timothy 4:10 (“For therefore trust in the living God,…”) and 2
Corinthians 1:9 (“…we should not trust in ourselves, but in
God….”). Although these passages have been quoted by Bible believers as
precedent for the use of “In God We Trust” as a national motto and on
our currency and coins, the word “trust” does not appear in these
passages in other translations of the Bible such as the Revised Standard
Version and the New English Bible. Thus, this contention presupposes, of
course, that the King James version is the only acceptable translation of the
Bible and that all Americans must accept the Bible as the inerrant “word
of God.” 


 An element of the American religious community
has always through our history been intolerant of the beliefs of others. When
Article VI was proposed for the Constitution there was a loud outcry that this
might allow infidels, Jews, and others to hold public office. When Thomas Paine
wrote “The Age of Reason” he was (in spite of his valuable services in
the Revolution) denounced as “that filthy little atheist.” When Thomas
Jefferson ran for president he was vilified because of his deistic principles.

There are still those
people today who think that they need to use the government to further their
religion. They want to coerce prayer in school among impressionable youth, fund
religious schools with tax monies, pour billions of dollars into religious
groups without adequate controls, post the Ten Commandments in every school and
courthouse, teach the religious concept of “creationism” in science
classes, and some would like to put “In God We Trust” on the state

Unless people who value our
diversity and want equal rights for all take action, we will gradually lose our
religious liberty.  Speak up for the
principle which made our churches strong and independent and our nation free. 

Open Letter to CSRA Religious Leaders

Dear Religious Leader,

As a young but growing organization in the area, the Central Savannah River Chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State would like to invite you to join us in our effort to maintain the wall of separation between church and state guaranteed in the Constitution, a wall that assures each of us the freedom to worship as we see fit.  Given that the faith of each individual is a highly personal matter not subject to government interpretation, it is incumbent on us as responsible citizens to protect religion from government encroachment and to insure that government remains free of religious entanglement.

Dear Religious Leader,

As a young but growing organization in the area, the Central
Savannah River Chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State
would like to invite you to join us in our effort to maintain the wall of
separation between church and state guaranteed in the Constitution, a wall that
assures each of us the freedom to worship as we see fit.  Given that the faith of each individual is a
highly personal matter not subject to government interpretation, it is
incumbent on us as responsible citizens to protect religion from government
encroachment and to insure that government remains free of religious

When our nation’s Founders separated religion and government,
it was a revolutionary experiment. That experiment has been an extraordinary
success. It’s made us the envy of the world, and Americans United wants to make
sure that wise policy continues.  We do
not want to descend into the world of Islamic Law, Jewish Law, Christian Law,
Hindu Law, or any other sectarian equivalent. 
If we allow any religion to gain a foothold into government, that
presents a threat to all of the other religions and more importantly to the
individual religious freedoms of all of us.

The Central Savannah River Chapter for Separation of Church
and State will support religious freedom by:

  • monitoring local government activity to assure
    that government is not dictating religious beliefs;
  • assuring that there are no religious
    requirements for holding local government offices;
  • evaluating local schools for activities that
    promote specific religious beliefs or activities;
  • examining local government for unacceptable
    religious influences; and
  • confronting religious intolerance wherever it
    might be found. 

If you are sympathetic with these goals, we invite you to
join us in our promotion of religious freedom in the Central Savannah River
Area.  If you wish to join us in our
efforts to promote religious freedom, please contact me so that I can put you
on our contact list.

Sincerely yours,


Frank Carl, President

Central Savannah River Chapter

Americans United for Separation of Church and State